Provider:
KPI:
Disaggregated By:
Regions:
Districts:
Care Levels:
Period:
No of facilities participating in EQA
-
No of facilities relaying EQA results to service provider within recommended timelines
(99%)
No of panels sent to EQA participating facilities
No of facilities receiving feedback from EQA service provider within recommended timelines
No of facilities scoring C (Passed EQA)
(9%)
No of facilities with errors in EQA
(35%)
No of facilities with errors in EQA followed up for corrective action
Average Turn Around Time (T.A.T) for shipping panels
Average Turn Around Time (T.A.T) for profficiency testing by labs
Average Turn Around Time (T.A.T) for relaying feedback to labs
Effective Average Time Around Time (T.A.T) for EQA Round